<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Exploiter 2 &#8211; bypassing DEP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/</link>
	<description>The blog for absolutely nothing!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0-day exploits for IE flaw another reason to switch to IE8 &#171; Web Designing</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>0-day exploits for IE flaw another reason to switch to IE8 &#171; Web Designing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-707</guid>
		<description>[...] as the current exploits do not circumvent DEP (though they could probably be combined with DEP bypass techniques). Removing access to the file iepeers.dll using either of the mechanisms described in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as the current exploits do not circumvent DEP (though they could probably be combined with DEP bypass techniques). Removing access to the file iepeers.dll using either of the mechanisms described in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; ¿Es vulnerable el sistema DEP? NoticiasTech</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; ¿Es vulnerable el sistema DEP? NoticiasTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-695</guid>
		<description>[...] al código publicado de un ingeniero de seguridad Google. El ingeniero, que va con el sobrenombre de Skypher, claramente aclara en su página que el propósito de su muestra es destacar a la comunidad de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] al código publicado de un ingeniero de seguridad Google. El ingeniero, que va con el sobrenombre de Skypher, claramente aclara en su página que el propósito de su muestra es destacar a la comunidad de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEP in Windows hacked &#171; Robby Pedrica&#8217;s Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>DEP in Windows hacked &#171; Robby Pedrica&#8217;s Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-694</guid>
		<description>[...] at where vulnerable memory that could be used to execute unapproved programs could be found. In Wever&#8217;s latest trick, the attacking code looks for clues on where to find memory that&#8217;s allowed by DEP to run [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at where vulnerable memory that could be used to execute unapproved programs could be found. In Wever&#8217;s latest trick, the attacking code looks for clues on where to find memory that&#8217;s allowed by DEP to run [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InfoSec Daily &#187; Episode 80 &#8211; Don&#8217;t &#8220;Stire&#8221; Me</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>InfoSec Daily &#187; Episode 80 &#8211; Don&#8217;t &#8220;Stire&#8221; Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-692</guid>
		<description>[...] News item 5: http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News item 5: <a href="http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/" rel="nofollow">http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nova técnica de ataque burla a maior defesa do Windows &#171; SECNOW &#8211; Web Security Analysis and Threads</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Nova técnica de ataque burla a maior defesa do Windows &#171; SECNOW &#8211; Web Security Analysis and Threads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-691</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Estou lançando isso porque acho que pode ajudar a explicar porque ASLR + DEP não são uma forma de mitigação que ofereça confiança suficiente, especialmente em plataformas x86&#8243;, diz Wever em um post de seu blog pessoal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Estou lançando isso porque acho que pode ajudar a explicar porque ASLR + DEP não são uma forma de mitigação que ofereça confiança suficiente, especialmente em plataformas x86&#8243;, diz Wever em um post de seu blog pessoal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Windows Now Doomed To A New Round Of Attacks? &#124; Revelations From An Unwashed Brain</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Windows Now Doomed To A New Round Of Attacks? &#124; Revelations From An Unwashed Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-689</guid>
		<description>[...] mitigation to put a lot of faith in, especially on x86 platforms,&quot; said Wever in a post to his personal blog on Monday.Wever should know about Windows: According to his LinkedIn profile, he worked for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mitigation to put a lot of faith in, especially on x86 platforms,&quot; said Wever in a post to his personal blog on Monday.Wever should know about Windows: According to his LinkedIn profile, he worked for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New exploit technique nullifies major Windows defense &#171;</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>New exploit technique nullifies major Windows defense &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-687</guid>
		<description>[...] to put a lot of faith in, especially on x86 platforms,&#8221; said Wever in a post to his personal blog on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to put a lot of faith in, especially on x86 platforms,&#8221; said Wever in a post to his personal blog on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googler ships exploit to defeat DEP &#124; Zero Day &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Googler ships exploit to defeat DEP &#124; Zero Day &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-686</guid>
		<description>[...] why ASLR+DEP are not a mitigation to put a lot of faith in, especially on x86 platforms,&#8221; SkyLined wrote on his blog.  &#8221;32-bits does not provide sufficient address space to randomize memory to the point where [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why ASLR+DEP are not a mitigation to put a lot of faith in, especially on x86 platforms,&#8221; SkyLined wrote on his blog.  &#8221;32-bits does not provide sufficient address space to randomize memory to the point where [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Could you make it work with recent Aurora exploit? It would be a good challenge for you and to prove that it&#039;s better than Immunity&#039;s JIT method</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you make it work with recent Aurora exploit? It would be a good challenge for you and to prove that it&#8217;s better than Immunity&#8217;s JIT method</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skypher · Internet Exploiter 2 – bypassing DEP &#171; Internet Cafe Solution</title>
		<link>http://skypher.com/index.php/2010/03/01/internet-exploiter-2-dep/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Skypher · Internet Exploiter 2 – bypassing DEP &#171; Internet Cafe Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skypher.com/?p=412#comment-684</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest here: Skypher · Internet Exploiter 2 – bypassing DEP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest here: Skypher · Internet Exploiter 2 – bypassing DEP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

